A group decision and negotiation support system for argumentation based reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes a Group Decision and Negotiation Support System for cooperative or non-cooperative argumentative discourses. The system provides agents means of expressing and weighing their individual arguments and preferences, the aim being the selection of a certain choice. It also supports defeasible and qualitative reasoning in the presence of ill-structured information. Argumentation is performed through a set of discourse acts which call a variety of procedures for the propagation of information in the corresponding discussion graph.
منابع مشابه
Improving Agent Performance for Multi-Resource Negotiation Using Learning Automata and Case-Based Reasoning
In electronic commerce markets, agents often should acquire multiple resources to fulfil a high-level task. In order to attain such resources they need to compete with each other. In multi-agent environments, in which competition is involved, negotiation would be an interaction between agents in order to reach an agreement on resource allocation and to be coordinated with each other. In recent ...
متن کاملRisk, negotiation and argumentation—a decision support system based approach
There has been very little published research on building legal decision support systems to perform risk assessment. Yet one of the principal goals of the law is to reduce risk through the avoidance of litigation. This paper discusses ongoing research on how legal decision support systems can support risk reduction and negotiation. Toulmin’s theory of argumentation is proposed as one technique ...
متن کاملArguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting An Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System
Negotiations occur in procurement, commerce, health and government, among organisations (companies and institutions) and individuals. For instance, electronic procurement (respectively electronic commerce) consists of business-to-business (respectively business-to-customer) purchase and provision of resources or services through the Internet. Typically, organisations and individuals invite bids...
متن کاملBelief Evolution of Intelligent Agent
This paper examines the Argumentation Negotiation of agent as a mechanism for solving the course-scheduling problem. We integrated multi-agent automatic negotiation mechanism and argumentation reasoning to apply in course scheduling problem. We want to evolve the belief of the agents by argumentation-based negotiation, so that agents can have more information of the environment, and select bett...
متن کاملDecision Support through Argumentation-Based Practical Reasoning
This extended research abstract describes an argumentation-based approach to modelling articulated decision making contexts. The approach encompasses a variety of argument and attack schemes aimed at representing basic knowledge and reasoning patterns for decision support.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996